212-729-9494

Federal Wire Fraud Statute

“Not just the criminal defense lawyer of the year, lawyer of my life”

FORMER CLIENT

Schedule Your Initial Consultation
awards logos d min
Atty Elena Fast Hero d min min

Understanding the Federal Wire Fraud Statute

The Federal Wire Fraud Statute—codified under 18 U.S.C. § 1343—makes it a federal crime to use electronic communications, such as phone calls, emails, or text messages, as part of a scheme to defraud another person of money or property. To secure a conviction, federal prosecutors must prove there was a deliberate plan to deceive and that wire communication was used to carry out that plan.

Wire fraud is a common charge in white-collar criminal cases and is frequently paired with other federal offenses. The statute’s broad scope allows prosecutors to apply it to a wide range of conduct, sometimes even when the accused may not have intended to commit fraud. Understanding how the law is interpreted and enforced makes it especially important.

Convictions under the wire fraud statute carry serious consequences, including lengthy prison sentences, substantial fines, and lasting damage to personal and professional reputations. Because these cases are often complex and involve aggressive federal investigations, seeking experienced legal representation early is essential.

At The Fast Law Firm, P.C., we represent individuals in New York who are under investigation for or charged with wire fraud. With a background in federal prosecution, our team understands how these cases are built. We work closely with our clients to review evidence, challenge the government’s case, and build a strong, strategic defense aimed at protecting their rights and achieving the best possible outcome.

Understanding the Federal Wire Fraud Statute
CONTACT US
CALL NOW

Elements Prosecutors Must Prove in a Wire Fraud Case

To convict someone of wire fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1343, federal prosecutors must establish three key elements:

  1. A scheme to defraud: The government must prove that the defendant knowingly devised or participated in a fraudulent scheme with the intent to deceive or cheat someone out of money, property, or honest services. The scheme does not need to be successful—it only needs to show the intent and a plan to defraud.
  2. Use of interstate wire communications: The fraudulent activity must have involved transmitting material through wire, radio, or television communication in interstate or foreign commerce. This includes phone calls, emails, text messages, or internet activity that crosses state lines—even if the act itself was local in nature.
  3. Intent to defraud: Prosecutors must demonstrate that the defendant acted with specific intent to deceive or mislead, not merely by accident or misunderstanding. Reckless disregard for the truth is often insufficient unless paired with other clear evidence of fraudulent intent.

Types of Conduct Prosecuted Under the Wire Fraud Statute

Wire fraud charges can arise from a wide range of fraudulent conduct, particularly schemes that exploit modern technology and digital communication. Common examples include:

  • Ponzi schemes: Fraudulent investment schemes that promise high returns but use new investor funds to pay earlier investors. These schemes ultimately collapse when new investments run dry.
  • Investment fraud: Misrepresenting financial opportunities or the risk involved to encourage investments under false pretenses.
  • Insider trading (when charged in tandem): While typically prosecuted under securities laws, wire fraud may be added when electronic communications are used to share or act on non-public information for personal gain.
  • Phishing and online scams: Using deceptive emails, texts, or websites to trick individuals into revealing sensitive information, such as bank details or login credentials.
  • Business misrepresentations: Providing false or misleading information during business transactions, such as inflating company value or hiding liabilities during mergers or deals.

Prosecutors often combine wire fraud charges with other federal crimes, such as conspiracy, securities fraud, or money laundering, to strengthen their case and expand sentencing exposure. With such high stakes involved, it is vital to defend against fraud charges rigorously.

Types of Conduct Prosecuted Under the Wire Fraud Statute
CONTACT US
CALL NOW

Potential Penalties Under the Federal Wire Fraud Statute

Wire fraud is a serious federal offense with severe penalties. Convictions can result in substantial prison time, significant financial consequences, and long-lasting reputational damage. The specific penalties depend on the scope of the fraud, the number of victims, and whether aggravating circumstances are present.

Under 18 U.S.C. § 1343, the maximum penalties for wire fraud are as follows:

  • Up to 20 years in prison per count
  • Up to 30 years in prison and fines up to $1,000,000 if the fraud involves a financial institution or affects a federal disaster relief program
  • Fines up to $250,000 for individuals and $500,000 for organizations
  • Restitution to victims is mandatory under the Mandatory Victim Restitution Act (MVRA)
  • Forfeiture of assets obtained through fraud or traceable to the offense

Each count of wire fraud can be charged separately, meaning multiple emails, calls, or transactions may lead to multiple counts—each carrying its own penalty. This often results in long, cumulative sentences if convicted on several counts.

Aggravating and Mitigating Factors in Sentencing

Federal judges rely on the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines to determine the final sentence, which takes into account both aggravating and mitigating factors:

Aggravating Factors

Aggravating factors may include:

  • High financial loss (especially if it exceeds $1 million)
  • A large number of victims or targeting vulnerable individuals
  • Use of sophisticated means to carry out the fraud
  • Leadership or organizer role in a criminal scheme
Aggravating and Mitigating Factors in Sentencing
CONTACT US
CALL NOW

Mitigating Factors

Mitigating factors include:

  • Acceptance of responsibility or a guilty plea
  • Cooperation with federal investigators
  • No prior criminal history
  • Limited role in the fraudulent activity

Sentences can vary widely depending on these factors. In some cases, defendants may qualify for reduced sentencing under Section 5K1.1 (substantial assistance) or receive a downward departure for early acceptance of responsibility.

Common Defenses to Federal Wire Fraud Charges

Facing a federal wire fraud charge can be overwhelming, but several legal defenses may be available depending on the facts of your case. Because the government must prove specific elements—such as intent to defraud and the use of interstate wire communications—challenging these aspects can be crucial to your defense. In some cases, broader legal doctrines such as entrapment or duress may also apply.

Lack of Intent to Defraud

A key element of wire fraud is intent. The prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that you knowingly and willfully devised a scheme to defraud. If intent is missing—or if the conduct in question stemmed from a misunderstanding, negligence, or a failed business deal—then no crime has occurred under the statute.

For example, a business venture that results in financial loss is not necessarily fraud unless there was a deliberate attempt to deceive investors or customers. A skilled defense attorney can use relevant jury instructions and case law to challenge the government’s narrative and highlight the absence of criminal intent.

Challenging the Use of Interstate Wire Communications

Wire fraud charges under 18 U.S.C. § 1343 require that interstate wire communications—such as phone calls, emails, or text messages—were used to further the fraudulent scheme.

A viable defense may involve questioning whether the communications actually crossed state lines. The charge may not satisfy the statutory requirements if the alleged messages or calls were conducted entirely within a single state and there’s no evidence they involved interstate commerce. Your attorney can review metadata, server routing, and communication logs to contest this aspect.

Entrapment and Duress

Entrapment is a defense available when law enforcement agents induce a person to commit a crime that they would not have otherwise committed. This requires showing both government inducement and a lack of predisposition on the defendant’s part.

Duress occurs when a person is forced to commit a crime under immediate threat of serious harm. While not often used in wire fraud cases, this defense may apply in rare situations where the defendant acted under extreme pressure, leaving no reasonable alternative.

Both defenses are highly fact-specific and require strong supporting evidence. If successful, they can lead to reduced charges—or even a complete dismissal.

What To Do If You’re Being Investigated or Charged

If you’re under investigation for wire fraud, acting quickly can significantly impact your outcome. Here are critical steps to protect yourself:

  1. Don’t Speak Without a Lawyer: Never speak to investigators or law enforcement without legal counsel. Exercising your right to remain silent protects you from unintentionally incriminating yourself.
  2. Preserve All Relevant Evidence: Secure all communications, digital records, and documentation. Avoid deleting or altering anything, as this may be viewed as obstruction.
  3. Contact The Fast Law Firm, P.C. Immediately: We offer confidential consultations to assess your case and discuss the best path forward. Wire fraud charges carry serious consequences, including prison time and lasting damage to your career and reputation. Our experienced attorneys will help you navigate the process with a proactive, strategic defense.
What To Do If You're Being Investigated or Charged
CONTACT US
CALL NOW

How The Fast Law Firm, P.C. Can Help With a Federal Wire Fraud Case

Federal wire fraud cases involve high stakes and complex legal procedures. At The Fast Law Firm, P.C., we provide strategic, client-focused defense rooted in deep federal court experience and a commitment to protecting our clients’ reputations.

  • Experienced federal defense and strategic representation: Our team has a proven record of defending clients in complex federal fraud investigations. Early legal intervention is crucial—our attorneys engage from the start to shape the case’s trajectory and prevent charges when possible. We carefully examine every detail and develop tailored defense strategies based on the unique circumstances of each client’s situation.
  • Client advocacy and reputation management: We recognize that reputational harm often accompanies legal accusations. In addition to legal strategy, we help manage media exposure and public narratives, especially in high-profile cases. Clear, consistent communication keeps our clients informed and supported throughout the process.
  • Federal experience with local insight: Our attorneys have extensive experience in federal courts across New York and a strong understanding of how local practices intersect with federal procedures. This insight lets us anticipate prosecution tactics and position our clients for the strongest possible defense.

Get in touch with The Fast Law Firm, P.C.

If you’re being investigated for wire fraud or facing charges under federal law, you need to act quickly. These charges carry serious penalties, including substantial prison time, hefty fines, and long-term reputational harm.

The Fast Law Firm, P.C., provides confidential consultations and strategic legal advice from the beginning. Our team has the federal experience and insight needed to protect your rights and build a strong defense.

Reach out today to schedule your consultation. Your future and freedom are too important to leave to chance.