What You Need to Know About Federal Bank Fraud Sentencing and How Fast Law Firm, P.C. Can Help

“Not just the criminal defense lawyer of the year, lawyer of my life”

FORMER CLIENT

awards logos d min
Atty Elena Fast Hero d min min

Federal bank fraud sentencing is the legal process that determines the penalties for individuals convicted of intentionally deceiving a financial institution to obtain money, assets, or property. Prosecuted under 18 U.S. Code § 1344, this serious offense can result in significant consequences.

Sentencing varies based on factors like changes in federal guidelines, court rulings, and the specifics of the case. For instance, penalties may be more severe if the financial loss is substantial or if the defendant has a history of similar offenses. As laws evolve, so do strategies for navigating them, making it crucial for those facing charges to understand current legal dynamics.

At Fast Law Firm, P.C., we help clients in New York navigate the federal bank fraud sentencing process. We review case details, clarify expectations, and work toward the best possible outcome by challenging the prosecution’s claims or seeking a reduced sentence.

Federal Bank Fraud Charges, Convictions, And Sentencing

Federal bank fraud is a serious offense under 18 U.S.C. § 1344, targeting schemes that aim to defraud financial institutions. Such crimes include making false statements to obtain funds from a bank, wire fraud, and mail fraud. Convictions can lead to significant penalties, including fines and long prison sentences.

State-level bank fraud cases differ significantly from federal ones. While state cases might involve smaller, localized actions, federal cases typically deal with larger schemes affecting multiple states or involving nationally chartered banks. This jurisdictional distinction elevates the complexity and potential penalties of federal cases.

Common examples of bank fraud encompass activities like check kiting, where an individual floats checks between accounts to create artificial balances, as well as loan fraud through misrepresentation of loan documents. Such offenses expose financial institutions to substantial risk and are aggressively prosecuted.

Federal agencies such as the FBI, DOJ, and IRS play crucial roles in prosecuting federal bank fraud. These agencies work together to investigate and build cases against individuals accused of defrauding banks. 

Our team at Fast Law PC is adept at navigating these complex legal landscapes and offers robust defense strategies to those facing such charges. For more details on these matters and how we can assist, explore federal bank fraud cases.

How Federal Bank Fraud Sentencing Is Determined

Federal bank fraud sentencing is governed by the United States Sentencing Guidelines (USSG) § 2B1.1 and 18 U.S.C. § 1344. The base offense can have a maximum penalty of 7 years in prison and a $250,000 fine under 18 U.S.C. § 3571). Courts may also order victim compensation (18 U.S.C. § 3663A) and impose fines or forfeiture (18 U.S.C. § 982). However, these sentences may increase to as much as 30 years or more, depending on the presence of certain factors. 

Aggravating And Mitigating Factors In Sentencing

Federal bank fraud sentences are influenced by specific aggravating and mitigating factors. These factors are critical in determining the final sentence imposed on a defendant.

Aggravating Circumstances:

These are factors that generally lead to increased sentences under the United States Sentencing Guidelines (USSG)

  • Use of sophisticated means: Complex schemes involving technology or intricate methods can significantly increase sentences. These sophisticated operations demonstrate a higher level of intent and deception.
  • Targeting vulnerable individuals: Crimes against groups such as the elderly can lead to harsher punishments. The targeting of elderly victims is regarded as especially egregious due to their susceptibility.
  • Obstruction of justice: Actions like destroying evidence or lying during investigations are considered severe, as they impede legal proceedings and reflect a lack of remorse. 
  • Other factors: 
    • Financial loss amount 
    • Number of victims affected 
    • Leadership roles may attract more punishment
    • Abuse of position (banking role) 
    • Threatening bank solvency
    • Criminal history

 Mitigating Circumstances:

  • First-time offender: Defendants with no prior criminal history may receive reduced sentences. This considers their overall character and potential for rehabilitation.
  • Acceptance of responsibility: Demonstrating remorse and taking responsibility for one’s actions can lead to a lighter sentence, reflecting a willingness to make amends.
  • Cooperation with federal investigators: Providing assistance to authorities, such as offering information or testifying, may lead to “downward departures” that might reduce sentencing outcomes.

To understand that these cases can vary depending on the factors, consider these two recent cases. A former NYS employee received 33 months for fraud, illustrating the serious repercussions. In contrast, a Dutchess County woman was sentenced to 51 months for fraud as well. The differences in the specifics of both cases and their varied outcomes paint a picture of what can happen in these cases.

In our practice, understanding these myriad aspects allows us to navigate the complexities of the federal sentencing landscape effectively.

Possible Defenses And Legal Strategies

In cases of federal bank fraud, various legal defenses can be vital to achieving favorable outcomes. Below are key approaches a defense attorney might use, keeping in mind that each case is unique and requires a tailored strategy based on specific facts and evidence.

Questioning Intent  

One effective strategy is to question the intent to defraud. If the defense can undermine allegations that the defendant knowingly intended to deceive a financial institution, it might reduce or dismiss charges.

Challenging the Evidence

Sometimes, proving this might require checking the accuracy of financial documents. Lawyers, therefore,  examine every document used in the prosecution’s case to uncover errors or inconsistencies.

Faulting Law Enforcement Procedures 

Additionally, dissecting and scrutinizing law enforcement procedures for any procedural errors can sometimes lead to evidence being deemed inadmissible.

Plea Agreements and Sentencing Negotiation

Plea bargaining can play a crucial role in federal bank fraud cases. By negotiating plea agreements, lawyers can potentially reduce sentencing exposure significantly.

Undertaking early cooperation with the authorities may significantly impact the outcomes. We emphasize the importance of this strategic approach to potentially lessen or mitigate harsh sentencing.

Fast Law Firm, P.C.’s Approach to Defense

At Fast Law Firm, P.C., we pride ourselves on our personalized approach to defense strategies. Our team’s relentless attention to detail and contribution from former prosecutors enables us to skillfully negotiate with prosecutors for favorable plea deals or prepare robust trial defenses.

Our experience with federal cases enables us to navigate complex legal landscapes successfully, often leading to reduced penalties or avoiding prison time altogether.

What To Expect After A Federal Conviction

Once convicted of a federal crime, several phases unfold. Federal prosecutors will play a significant role during the trial, but their influence extends into the sentencing phase as well. Convictions often result in prison time, with sentences served in federal prison facilities.

For those pondering the length of time one might face, sentences for crimes like bank fraud can reach up to 30 years. Some offenses may not involve mandatory minimum penalties, leaving room for negotiation during sentencing.

Beyond prison, a conviction can lead to supervised release or probation. These alternatives bring certain restrictions. Probation terms may include regular meetings with officers and compliance with specific conditions.

The ramifications extend further into one’s personal and professional life. Finding employment becomes challenging. Employers often hesitate to hire individuals with a criminal record. Their financial reputation may also suffer damage, affecting credit ratings and future borrowing.

Under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), fraud convictions can be classified as deportable offenses. As such, non-citizens face additional challenges with immigration status, putting them at risk of deportation or loss of residency. 

There’s hope through appeals and sentence reductions. Qualified appellate counsel can guide the process, whether seeking sentence modification or pursuing compassionate release.

These possibilities emphasize the importance of experienced legal guidance. Understanding the full scope of post-conviction life can help mitigate some of the consequences and plan for the future effectively.

How Fast Law Firm, P.C. Can Help in Federal Bank Fraud Sentencing Cases

Federal bank fraud charges carry significant consequences. However, with early intervention and strategic defense, we can work towards minimizing sentencing exposure. Our team, consisting of former prosecutors, employs professional analysis and introduces mitigation evidence to influence outcomes favorably.

Schedule a Confidential Consultation

Facing federal fraud charges is daunting. We invite you to contact us immediately for a comprehensive discussion about your case. Understanding your circumstances is the first step in providing tailored defense strategies. 

We offer free consultations and remain available at all times to address your concerns. To learn more about related offenses, visit our Federal Bankruptcy Fraud page. Reach out to begin safeguarding your future against these serious charges.